Is Hillary Clinton being transparent enough?

On Thursday, the Clinton Foundation reported an extra $26.4 million they had received that were previously undisclosed. As the money was initially labeled as “revenue” because it was used to pay the Clintons for their speeches, the Foundation did not include it in the list of its public listings of its contributors, the Washington Post reports. This potentially conflicts with the 2008 ethics agreement holding the Foundation to revealing its donors and funding sources that might present conflicts of interest with Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.

The State Department has also released the first round of Hillary Clinton’s emails when she held the position of Secretary of State. These emails are Benghazi-related and, according to the State Department, "do not change the essential facts or our understanding of the events before, during, or after the attacks,” In light of these new updates, do you think that Hillary Clinton is conducting her campaign with enough transparency?